<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Doing Words - Latest Comments in Jobs admits: DRM doesn&amp;#8217;t work for music</title><link>http://doingwords.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://doingwords.disqus.com/jobs_admits_drm_doesn8217t_work_for_music_71/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 19:02:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Jobs admits: DRM doesn&amp;#8217;t work for music</title><link>http://doingwords.com/?p=263#comment-21918655</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No less a learned journal than &lt;a href="http://www.economist.com/daily/news/displaystory.cfm?story_id=8660389" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.economist.com/daily/news/displaystory.cfm?story_id=8660389"&gt;The Economist&lt;/a&gt; now says that Jobs is right and it would be best for the music industry to sell their content DRM free - yay!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 19:02:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jobs admits: DRM doesn&amp;#8217;t work for music</title><link>http://doingwords.com/?p=263#comment-21918654</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Alternatively, Jobs is just being super-cute so he can say to the Euro regulators "hey, guys, it ain't me wants this DRM stuff, it's those muppets at Warner-EMI-Sony who don't get it, so jive daddio." Or something. I don't believe that Jobs is a sponsor of open media; he's refused to license the OSX code to other manufacturers, ferchrissake. He's a control freak. In a bad turtleneck.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lloydshep</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 05:31:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>