Doing Words - Latest Comments in Facebook’s bad case of not loving you

Re: Facebook’s bad case of not loving you

nalexander21 — Mon, 02 Mar 2009 06:48:56 -0000

People misunderstand copyright, but this video explains it well. It is not the ownership of your life. It is the commercial use of your work to make profit for a corporation that has fooled you into donating it to them… forever.

This comment was originally posted on Rocketboom

Re: Facebook’s bad case of not loving you

nalexander21 — Mon, 02 Mar 2009 06:46:30 -0000

Now when people keep asking me – are you on facebook – I can send them a link to explain clearly why not.

This comment was originally posted on Rocketboom

Re: Facebook’s bad case of not loving you

boydgarrick — Mon, 02 Mar 2009 04:02:48 -0000

You don’t have any ownership to a photograph in which you appear; the photographer is the owner. You have the right to not have your likeness used for financial gain without your approval, but you don’t own the photo in any way.

This comment was originally posted on Rocketboom

Re: Facebook’s bad case of not loving you

Floodedgunner — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:10:53 -0000

Until a picture of you gets posted that you happen to not like, say it’s you in a bad way, and you don’t want it on the web. Or someone has a picture of you doing something with someone that you wanted to keep a secret, or that reveals something embarrassing about you. you’d want that picture gone, right? Well too bad, Facebook will keep it.

This comment was originally posted on Rocketboom

Re: Facebook’s bad case of not loving you

EmotionToilet — Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:18:02 -0000

What if your friend posts a picture and you tag yourself in it and you really like that picture. And then they close their Facebook page, and that picture is no longer available. Wouldn’t that suck? You’re in the picture, so you partially have ownership of it. This is where Facebook steps in and says, we’re going to keep the picture on our servers so all your friends can still look at it. And I think that’s okay.

This comment was originally posted on Rocketboom

Re: Facebook’s bad case of not loving you

NikeMckenzie — Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:19:46 -0000

onleh 2 peepz wit no fwiends

This comment was originally posted on Rocketboom

Re: Facebook’s bad case of not loving you

coffee — Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:48:38 -0000

the fact that Facebook change their TOS back so quickly is an indication that they knew they were wrong in the first place

This comment was originally posted on Rocketboom

Re: Facebook’s bad case of not loving you

LizzyAston — Sun, 22 Feb 2009 07:48:31 -0000

i love it when people correct grammar, they always use capital letters, full stops and punctuation

penis

This comment was originally posted on Rocketboom

Re: Facebook’s bad case of not loving you

chick7489 — Sat, 21 Feb 2009 18:25:43 -0000

what was that? i never seen someone do that beforethat was hilarious… i didnt see that one comming haha [=

This comment was originally posted on Rocketboom

Re: Facebook’s bad case of not loving you

leo267 — Sat, 21 Feb 2009 17:54:50 -0000

“if you can’t get out, maybe you shouldn’t get in in the first place”

that’s what she said.

This comment was originally posted on Rocketboom

Re: Facebook’s bad case of not loving you

shortstop20 — Sat, 21 Feb 2009 02:59:23 -0000

I’d pee in her butt.

This comment was originally posted on Rocketboom

Re: Facebook’s bad case of not loving you

phoenixeyefist — Sat, 21 Feb 2009 02:57:58 -0000

DONT HAVE FACEBOOK ACCOUNT… HAHAHA

This comment was originally posted on Rocketboom

Re: Facebook’s bad case of not loving you

xaechireon — Sat, 21 Feb 2009 02:54:15 -0000

Facebook’s mama is so fat you could miss a season of Simpsons when she walked past the telly.

This comment was originally posted on Rocketboom

Re: Facebook’s bad case of not loving you

shn1325 — Sat, 21 Feb 2009 02:46:46 -0000

haha truedat=) the british one

This comment was originally posted on Rocketboom

Re: Facebook’s bad case of not loving you

xrenube — Sat, 21 Feb 2009 02:41:42 -0000

sub ORL^Y for a free peace!

This comment was originally posted on Rocketboom

Re: Facebook’s bad case of not loving you

khaphishan — Sat, 21 Feb 2009 02:34:54 -0000

like sarah in prison break

This comment was originally posted on Rocketboom

Re: Facebook’s bad case of not loving you

Ook — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:57:57 -0000

Maybe appoint as moderator whoever deleted some of my choice posts.

This comment was originally posted on Rocketboom

Re: Facebook’s bad case of not loving you

Ook — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:48:36 -0000

Is this some sort of outreach program or something? Why not get system that require registration to post?

This comment was originally posted on Rocketboom

Re: Facebook’s bad case of not loving you

Ook — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:46:09 -0000

The Weather Underground, recently brought back into the limelight by election 2008, chose their name well.

This comment was originally posted on Rocketboom

Re: Facebook’s bad case of not loving you

Ook — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:42:20 -0000

Good Internet sales idea: a cat hair vacuum cleaner for keyboards.

This comment was originally posted on Rocketboom

Re: Facebook’s bad case of not loving you

Ook — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:40:16 -0000

Probably a Jewish American.

This comment was originally posted on Rocketboom

Re: Facebook’s bad case of not loving you

Connie Crosby — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:19:13 -0000

Extremely helpful explanation. I am reposting to my blog. Good job!!

Cheers,

Connie

This comment was originally posted on Rocketboom

Re: Facebook’s bad case of not loving you

C-C — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:48:05 -0000

Oh Drew …

This comment was originally posted on Rocketboom

Re: Facebook’s bad case of not loving you

Amir Khan — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:46:48 -0000

Thanks for sharing information in a great way. Btw Joanne you’re getting bulky..Please control your weight.